Archive : Month

Dodd-frank, competitiveness and the cost of financial regulation

POSTED ON May 27th  - POSTED IN Financial Regulation
Dodd-Frank is down there somewhere

Dodd-Frank is down there somewhere

This month a group called the American Action Forum (AAF) published a document entitled “The Growth Consequences of Dodd-Frank,” looking at the U.S. Dodd-Frank legislation introduced to curb financial excesses in the wake of the global financial crisis that first emerged in 2007.

Reflecting the complexity and — how shall we put this delicately? — dodginess of large parts of the financial sector, Dodd-Frank is a huge and unwieldy creature. It’s also been set upon by sharks: read this stunning (though out of date) Matt Taibbi article about how it’s done. As he put it:

Quote of the week: Bill Gates on corporate taxes

POSTED ON May 19th  - POSTED IN Blog, Quotations, Tax
Photo: World Economic Forum, Creative Commons

Photo: World Economic Forum, Creative Commons

From a Bloomberg report on a Bill Gates interview:

Gates scoffed at comparisons linking taxes and regulation to slower growth. “The idea that there’s some direct connection, that all these innovators are on strike because tax rates are at 35 percent on corporations, that’s just such nonsense.” ‘

also:

“The highest economic growth decade was the 1960s. Income tax rates were 90 percent.”

This is part of a much bigger picture: that low (or high) corporate taxes do nothing to make an economy as a whole more (or less) ‘competitive.’ Read more about all this here.

Is France’s economy really less ‘competitive’ than Britain’s?

POSTED ON May 14th  - POSTED IN Blog, Tax, What is competitiveness?

Our tweet of the day, from a former external member of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee:

This post is just a reminder, really, about all the nonsense that is spoken in the name of ‘competitiveness.’

Do real investors chase corporate tax cuts?

POSTED ON May 11th  - POSTED IN Blog, Tax
Guess which one got the corporate tax cut

Guess which one got the corporate tax cut?

Cross-posted with the Tax Justice Network.

From the Financial Times, a report on a survey by the Tolley Tax Journal of businesses’ responses to the UK’s policy of savage cuts to the corporate income tax.  It’s about the UK, but it has wide international relevance.

“More than six out of 10 respondents thought the cut in the corporate tax rate, by 8 percentage points to 20 per cent, had boosted their own companies’ investment and growth, although for most it only had a marginal impact.”

Optimistic about the state: Martin Wolf’s searing attack on the Competitiveness Agenda

POSTED ON May 7th  - POSTED IN Blog, Financial Regulation, Tax
Martin Wolf (Photo: Helen Abraham Creative Commons)

Martin Wolf (Photo: Helen Abraham, Creative Commons)

Update: this post has now been published on Naked Capitalism.

Martin Wolf, the Financial Times’ chief economics commentator and one of the world’s most influential economists, published a book in 2004 called Why Globalization Works: the case for the global market economy. A forceful, heavily researched and uncompromising work, it became for a while a bit of a bible for those pushing for freer trade and further liberalisation of the global economy.

When the global financial crisis hit in 2007, calling into question some of the mainstream economic profession’s most cherished beliefs, Wolf – unlike many economists – seems to have done a serious re-think, and he has found a dramatic and radical new enthusiasm for reining in an out-of-control financial sector, while remaining essentially in favour of free trade. Wolf told us in an email in response to an earlier draft this post:

“I have only changed my mind on finance and even then I was already quite sceptical. I think my chapter on the state was rather good.”

The chapter in question, the subject of this blog, is entitled “Sad About the State”.

The Celtic Tiger: the Irish banking inquiry and a tale of two booms

POSTED ON May 5th  - POSTED IN Blog, Financial Regulation, Tax
The IFSC in Dublin's Docklands

The IFSC in Dublin’s Docklands

One of our inaugural articles on this site was a post in March looking at the causes of the “Celtic Tiger” boom in Ireland. It contained a striking graph and a wealth of analysis suggesting strongly that what caused the boom was, above all, Ireland’s accession to the EU single market, rather than its supposedly ‘competitive’ corporate tax policies. After all, Ireland has been trying to be a tax haven since the 1950s, but it was only in the early 1990s that take-off began (also see this rollicking historical account of how Ireland became a corporate and financial tax haven, or offshore financial centre.) 

How tax ‘competition’ affects women

POSTED ON May 4th  - POSTED IN Blog, Tax
Tax-Justice-and-Human-Rights_medium

Credit: Center for Economic and Social Rights

From the Association for Women’s Rights in Development:

“The current “race to the bottom” in which tax competition among developing countries takes place to attract corporate and foreign direct investment is having a negative impact on government budgets needed to finance the advancement of women’s rights.

We prefer the more economically literate term ‘tax wars‘ instead of tax ‘competition’, but no matter: there is a clear and powerful argument here.  The key point is not that budget cuts affect everyone, including women, but that women are disproportionately affected by tax policies that are substantially the fruit of tax wars. It is not just about how much revenue is raised, either: it is about how revenue is raised. As it notes:

Back to Top